Archive for the ‘Trail Access’ Category

Quarterly Agency Meeting Report Sept. 2012

Friday, September 28th, 2012

CORBA conducts quarterly meetings with representatives from California Department of Parks and Recreation Angeles District and National Park Service Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area. It is a chance for us to voice concerns and report on upcoming and past trail work, events, and CORBA programs.

Of particular note are a couple of topics that have been posted on our blog recently. The first is enforcement of dangerous behavior by bicyclists (excessive speed, disregard for other users’ safety). The second, which was brought up in a reply to one of our blogs, is the concept of alternate day use on trails that are currently closed to bicyclists.

Enforcement: This is not a new issue. Citations have and will continue to be issued if and when rangers see cyclists riding in a manner that might endanger the resource, themselves, or other users. This can be, but is not limited to, going too fast. However, the issue that has brought more attention to this behavior is the increased use of the website Strava to create a “time trial” format. Even though groups are not going out on the trails and racing, the very nature of being able to “compete” against others by trying to post the fastest time on the Strava site creates a virtual group, and a situation that could lead to riders going fast at the expense of their and other users’ safety. It was noted that speed is also situational, and that as long as people are being safe there isn’t necessarily an issue with speed.

Alternate Days: The State and NPS representatives at the meeting agreed that alternate days are a viable alternative to trails that are currently closed to bicycles, and recognized that they were aware of similar programs that were being used successfully in other parts of the country. It was pointed out however, that there is currently a Change In Use process in place that allows for changing a trail that does not allow bicycles to one of designated as open to bicycles. The Yearling/Lookout Trails is currently undergoing this Change In Use process (see below for the status of this process). The comment was made that any change to the designation of a trail would have to go through the formal Change In Use process, so it makes sense to try to change a trail’s designation to shared use all the time, not on alternate days. One note: the suggestion of alternate trails came primarily in response to trails that are closed in the State Wilderness of Point Mugu State Park. State Wilderness basically follows the Federal Wilderness Act of 1964 which, among other things, bans “mechanized transport” which includes bicycles. To change the Wilderness Act would require a lengthy and costly political and legal battle which CORBA is not prepared to wage.

Yearling/Lookout Update: This trail, which is on the northwest edge of Malibu Creek State Park with, is slated for an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) because it will need to be rerouted before any change in use can occur. The Topanga General Plan/Malibu Lagoon EIR is taking precedent over other EIRs, so the Yearling/Lookout EIR’s status is on hold at this point. Click here to see our original blog article regarding the Change In Use for Yearling/Lookout trails.

TRAIL MANAGEMENT PLAN UPDATE

The long awaited NPS Trail Management Plan (TMP) is likely going to move forward soon. A consultant has been identified and public meetings and other efforts should begin shortly, with a projected completion date of early 2014. Once completed, the TMP will allow agencies within the the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area to formally address many pressing issues, among them shared use on many trails that are currently restricted to hiking and equestrian use only.

 

 

More Work Taking Place in Sullivan Canyon Starting Early October

Saturday, September 22nd, 2012

From the Southern California Gas Company Public Affairs Manager

Southern California Gas Company Sullivan Canyon Pipeline Protection Project 

SoCal Gas plans to perform maintenance and repair work to the portion of Sullivan Canyon, which has been owned and maintained by SoCal Gas since 1960, in accordance with State and Federal pipeline safety regulations and a 5-year Maintenance Plan.  We are currently in the second year of that plan.

Heavy rains during 2010 and 2011 caused severe earth erosion and washout damage to the pipeline maintenance access road within the canyon.  As a result, buried SoCal Gas transmission pipelines have been exposed in some areas.  It is important that we repair this damage in order to maintain safety and so that we may continue to provide Southern California residents with a safe and reliable supply of natural gas.

For your consideration, the following impacts are to be expected in your neighborhood.  Please note that these are only approximations and are subject to change.  We will do our best to keep you apprised of any changes.

  • Duration of work (tentatively) – October 6, 2012, temporary restricted public access to certain areas of the canyon, which will remain in effect until work is completed.  At minimum, work is estimated to be completed by January 2013.  Staff will safely guide the public around restricted areas of the canyon.
  • Hours of Operation – 7am-7pm weekdays and 8am -6pm Saturdays.  No work will be performed Sundays;
  • Reduction of public curb parking at entrance to canyon;
  • Intermittent loud noise in the immediate work areas;
  • Increased dust in the immediate work areas;
  • Increased traffic from work crews and equipment; and
  • Signage indicating access restrictions.

Location and Logistics

  • 4.5 mile stretch of land that comprises Sullivan Canyon between Queensferry Rd. and Mulholland Dr. (Farmer’s Fire Rd.) at both ends of the canyon;
  • Equipment and material will be delivered via Queensferry Rd.;
  • Mulholland Drive will be the primary delivery/export route to avoid hindering traffic in the neighborhood near Queensferry Rd.; and
  • On-site construction management who will manage work crews to ensure that work is performed neatly and that a limited footprint is left in the canyon.

Purpose and Project Scope

  • Restoration of access road including grading and fill for safe pedestrian and vehicular use; the road will remain essentially an earthen road. and
  • Repair of cover to two high – pressure transmission pipelines.

Environmental Impacts

In order to re-establish the road and repair the pipelines while minimizing environmental impacts to the canyon, SoCal Gas has commissioned and will be working closely with professional environmental consultants during project planning and implementation.  To date, a survey has been conducted by the project biologist and an arborist recommended by the City of Los Angeles.  The survey identified and the City concurred upon the removal of two hazardous oak trees within the project alignment.  A hazard tree removal permit will be issued for this work and these trees will be mitigated at a 5:1 ratio (10 new trees will be planted as replacements) per the California Department of Fish and Game.  No additional oak trees or other native trees will be removed.

Oversight Agencies and Additional Advisory Assistance

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers
  • Los Angeles Region California Regional Water Quality Control Board
  • California Department of Fish and Game
  • Los Angeles Fire Department (fire prevention plan)
  • Sage Institute (environmental advisement)

Updates regarding additional closures and/or canyon restrictions, or changes to the project plan will be distributed periodically throughout the duration of the project.  Closures or restrictions will also be posted on the gate at Queensferry Road and at the entrance to the property off of Mulholland in advance, to the extent feasible.

We apologize for the inconvenience caused by this necessary work to ensure pipeline safety and maintenance of a reliable natural gas supply to the Los Angeles basin area.  SoCal Gas appreciates your understanding of the need for this maintenance work and temporary disruption of canyon access.

Please know that safety is our first priority.  We appreciate customers and members of the community keeping us informed on conditions surrounding our facilities.  Likewise, we believe it is important to communicate with you when we know our work will impact our neighbors. Again, there are two high-pressure transmission pipelines located in the canyon and we will continue to periodically perform maintenance work to them as-needed to ensure safety.  We will provide notification when projects are scheduled and we will do our best to work with neighbors and the public to minimize impacts to customers and stakeholders.  It is our goal to keep disruptions to a minimum and we regret temporary inconveniences.

Thank you for your understanding while we perform this necessary maintenance and repair work.  Should you have any questions, please call Krista Phipps at (323) 578-2650 or email kphipps@semprautilities.com.

Mapping the Rattling Creek Epic

Thursday, September 20th, 2012

IMBA’S MAPPING SPECIALIST VISITS PENNSYLVANIA

IMBA Mapping Specialist Leslie Kehmeier has been busier than a one-armed paper-hanger laying the groundwork for IMBA’s mapping program. Launching this type of venture is no small task, but one that will provide valuable resources for IMBA’s grassroots network in the years to come.

In addition to a vast amount of planning and research, Kehmeier has spent time in the field mapping selected trail systems in different regions. During those efforts, she’s had the opportunity to work with local chapters and advocates collecting information, refining techniques and developing the process for acquiring data on the ground.

“Our volunteer network will be a key aspect in building a comprehensive trails database. The knowledge they
can provide about their local trail systems is invaluable and we look forward to working with them as the mapping program continues to grow,” says Kehmeier.

In March, Kehmeier traveled to Lykens, Pennsylvania, home of the Rattling Creek Trails that were designated as an IMBA Epic in 2011. Until recently, this exceptionally well-designed and built trail system has remained largely unknown. Alongside local rider Mike Kuhn and Mid-Atlantic Region Director Frank Maguire, Kehmeier collected GPS data for the entire trail system and facilities, resulting in the map on these pages.

In upcoming weeks and months, IMBA will release a small sampling of additional Epics maps. But there’s much more to come with IMBA’s mapping program.

For advocacy work, maps provide an effective way to communicate with local land managers and decision makers. Maps can showcase the need to develop trail maintenance plans, inform public comment for protecting trails and help plan routes for future riding opportunities. In the near future, IMBA’s network of chapters, members and supporters will have access to a robust set of GIS and mapping tools to help them create great maps in their own areas and trail systems. Kehmeier will conduct trainings and help our grassroots network create customized maps that suit their local needs.

In Lykens, as with many communities, trail systems have proven to be a powerful economic driver. The new Rattling Creek Trails map will be used for more than just a navigational guide. The local city council is leading the charge to develop more trail opportunities in the area, including a rail trail. The map will become a useful tool in future fundraising campaigns and grant cycles and will illustrate the potential for trail opportunities and connections in the area. A picture is worth a thousand words, but a map could be worth thousands of dollars.

MAPMAKING IN THE FIELD

Mapping a trail system on a mountain bike is a challenge, but if you do it right the results will be worthwhile. Keep in mind the more comprehensive the acquisition effort, the more potential it has to generate different maps. This data I collected for this Rattling Creek map can be spun into other versions that highlight needs like trail maintenance or funding requests.
Once in the field, try to be patient — you won’t set any ride-time records while gathering trail data. Be ready for the process to require multiple days, frequent stops and constant backtracking. Be sure to focus on the components of the trail system and its supporting facilities, like trailheads and parking lots. Remember to capture points for notable bike-specific features like rock gardens, switchbacks and ladder bridges. I like to jot down lots of notes in the field that I can refer back to when I’m drafting a map on my computer screen.

It’s usually possible to acquire existing map data that covers vegetation, waterways and road systems, so those things shouldn’t be the focus of your field mapping efforts. Consider rounding out your documentation by capturing photos, videos and other materials that you might use to create a memorable, multi-media map for online presentations. When you assemble all the elements you’ll have a map that truly tells a story.

— Leslie Kehmeier, IMBA mapping specialist

The Rattling Creek Epic offers flowy trails punctuated with rock gardens, creating classic East Coast riding that rewards bike handling as much as fitness. Trails don’t get more sustainable than the Rocks Ridge section — a 3/4-mile boulder field that’s featured on the IMBA website under the heading “Toughen Your Trail With Rocks.” Unforgiving, yes. But it’s rideable if you’ve got the chops. More info at imba.com/epics.

Copied from IMBA Trail News, Summer 2012

Big Bear Group and USFS Partner for project

Monday, September 17th, 2012

The trails around Big Bear Lake, CA, enjoy a rich mountain biking heritage. Big Bear has played host to several World Championships and has the potential to become an outstanding riding destination for cyclists of all styles and abilities. Over the past few years, the Big Bear Valley Trails Foundation (BBVTF) has grown into a well-known and well-respected group of multi-use, non-motorized trail advocates, with the goal of developing a vibrant trail network in partnership with the San Bernardino National Forest (SBNF).

The current focus of the BBVTF’s work is the Skyline Trail, a planned, 15- to 20-mile network of singletrack to be located on a ridge just to the south of the ski resort. The trail will be designed inside a firebreak and will have options to ride short loops or the entire trail. “The Skyline project stands to become a premiere mountain bike trail network in southern California and within the Western states,” says Patrick Kell, IMBA Southwest Region Director.

Recently, the BBVTF held a showing of the documentary Pedal Driven to a packed audience. The group presented its work and committed $40,000 in cash and in-kind volunteer time to the project. The USFS committed $80,000 to the project. “Our partnership with the trails foundation is the example of how land stewardship is going to happen in the future,” says District Ranger Scott Tangenberg. “It’s the peoples’ forest; they are here to take care of it. I want to facilitate that and encourage their help.”

The work on the Skyline Trail has fostered a positive relationship between the BBVTF and the SBNF that has led to the consideration of the South Shore trail network, including a desire to maximize connectivity of the existing system so it best meets the needs of a variety of trail users. IMBA Trail Solutions will likely be contracted this summer to begin the planning process of the Skyline Trail. Kell hopes to see construction begin as early as late summer.

Copied from IMBA Trail News, Summer 2012

Strava String Update 9/8/12

Saturday, September 8th, 2012

By Mark Langton

Thanks for all your replies and questions to the original blog “It’s Not Strava’s Fault Mountain Bikers Are Ignorant.” Before I answer some of the questions posed, I wanted to update you on some important information I got while at a meeting last Wednesday. Specifically, National Park Service (NPS) Ranger Melanie Turner stated that bicyclists using trails unsafely will be cited, and no warnings will be issued. Citations include mandatory court appearances and up to several hundred dollars in fines. She did not specify which areas of NPS property within the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area (SMMNRA) would be getting increased ranger presence, although Cheeseboro Canyon was mentioned during the conversation. Rangers from California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks) and Mountains Recreation and Conservation Authority (MRCA) were also at the meeting, and while they were less specific as to their enforcement tactics, they said that they would be vigilant in making sure trails are safe for all users. If you are wondering about the references to the three different agencies, it is because within the SMMNRA there are three primary open space administrative agencies, NPS, State Parks, and MRCA. NPS and MRCA currently have the most inclusive trail use policy (shared use in most cases), with State Parks being more restrictive, with many trails still closed to bicycles, despite those trails being exactly the same as ones that are open to bicycles.

The replies to the original post are a wonderful microcosm of CORBA’s efforts over the 25+ years we have been striving for shared use trails in the SMMNRA. Below in italics are statements and/or questions that are most relevant to this discussion, after which I will try to answer or clarify:

Can you please tell me if the idea of alternate trail days (those for hikers / equestrians and those for mtn bikers) has ever been brought up at a previous meeting? If so I would like to know why this policy has not been adopted by the NPS.

Yes, this idea has been posed before, with ensuing heated discussion. While used in other parts of the country to varying degrees of success, we (CORBA and the agencies) felt that it would likely be too difficult to enforce and would still create rule-breakers and a bad image for whoever did not adhere to the posted use restrictions. However, I would be in favor of revisiting the topic and will bring it up at our next meeting with the agencies.

I am just wondering why some trails (a lot of them in Sycamore) are off limits for mountain bikes.

As mentioned in a reply to the original post, many of the trails in Pt. Mugu State Park (Sycamore Canyon) to the east of the main canyon are in state Wilderness and are therefore off-limits to to bicycles (which are considered “mechanized transport”). State Parks unfortunately maintains a restrictive use policy on many of their trails that are not in Wilderness, which CORBA feels is biased and unfair. In response to this situation, State Parks has created a system to identify a trail as viable for shared use (hiking, cycling, equestrian), but it is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive (read costly).

I have been hiking on some of these trails and during the week you will never see a single person on them other than the occasional mountain biker and me.

This is one of CORBA’s biggest examples of why trail closures don’t work. When it comes to trail closures, you can’t close a trail seven days a week when it really only gets used on two of them, mainly the weekends/holidays.

Never once in my life have I seen a trail that said no hikers or horses.

There aren’t many, but there are a few trails in the SMMNRA that are closed to horses. As long as horses are allowed on trails, then it is everyone’s responsibility to yield for the safety of everyone on the trail. The unfortunate thing about this situation is that a very small percentage of the user community (equestrians, approximately 5 percent) is being given almost complete access to the trails, while a much larger user group (cyclists, approximately 35 percent) is being restricted.

Why would the park ever close a perfectly good trail? Just to further congest our trail system? Trying to create more conflict?

I’m sure it’s not the intent, but it’s what’s happening.

There could easily be a trail that parallels the main road through Sycamore for bikes only to get them off the road where 90% of the hikers are and the same goes for Cheeseboro.

CORBA has made this suggestion several times over the years. The answer we usually get is that the agencies’ primary mandate is open space protection and preservation. Building parallel trails to accomodate single use recreation is not a suitable use of their resources. This is not to say it couldn’t be revisited. One thing to note here is that just because a trail is marked “bikes only”, it doesn’t mean hikers wouldn’t use it also. But I am in favor of this idea (it’s just probably not going to happen).

 

RPV Trail Plan Saved (Probably), Final Vote 10/2/12

Friday, September 7th, 2012

The article below is from the Easy Reader newspaper (Hermosa Beach). It details the struggles Rancho Palos Verdes mountain bikers (represented by CORBA Palos Verdes) have been having with access to local trails, dating back to 2008 (and even before that). The news is good, but it still remains to be seen until the next RPV City Council meeting on October 2. People in favor of bicycle access to Rancho Palos Verdes trails are encouraged to attend. For more information go to www.mtbpv.org/

RPV TO AMEND TRAILS USE PLAN

Mountain bikers could see more access to trails at the Palos Verdes Nature Preserve and Abalone Cove Shoreline Park and Ecological Preserve if, as expected, the Rancho Palos Verdes City Council decides the matter Oct. 4. (Info incorrect, actual date is Oct. 2–CORBA)

The proposal drew lots of public input last May when it first came before the council after a series of public workshops earlier in the year that drew around 40 people each. Several speakers opposed the additional access for bikers, causing the council to reconsider the issue until after the summer.

The original trails use plan for most of the 1,400-acre nature preserve went into effect in 2009 after a nearly two-year process led by a committee of citizens and public officials. Now the non-profit Palos Verdes Peninsula Nature Conservancy, which oversees the property, wants to designate trails on a remaining 190-acre portion known as Filiorum.

The opportunity also opened the door to revise the existing trails plan on the rest of the preserve, said Danielle LeFer, conservation director. In all, mountain bikers will potentially regain access to two trails in the Portuguese Bend area and four trails in the Abalone Cove area.

“I know mountain bikers would like to see more trails open to bikes,” said LeFer. “We incorporated all the comments we received and responded to those. Based on all of those, and discussions with rangers and city staff, we came up with some recommended changes.”

When the issue comes back to the council next month, little will have changed from what was presented in May, said Ara Mihranian, deputy director of community development for RPV.

“There are other groups out there that have their own agendas who are asking the council to make changes, but that’s not what’s being recommended by staff,” Mihranian said.

Long-time mountain biker Troy Braswell said he’s concerned the council could reverse a lot of the hard work accomplished in 2009. But council member Susan Brooks said that’s not the case.

The council postponed its decision so it could become more familiar with the preserve, Brooks said.

“The community had been working on this, but I think a lot of us were not aware of just how intensely they have been,” Brooks said. “Now that I’ve come to see just how much work has been done in the ensuing years, it really gives me a new respect for the process that has already taken place and we need to respect that.”

Brooks said RPV bears the burden of managing all the parks on the peninsula with no additional funding aside from city coffers.

“We have over 40,000 residents and we’re the largest city on the hill, but we bear the responsibility for all the parks and all the recreational facilities,” Brooks said. “Is RPV supposed to be the playground for all of the LA basin?”

By designating the trails, conservationists hope to limit impacts to the natural terrain as well as conflicts with different users. Since June 18, a ranger hotline received 55 calls, mostly about off-leash dogs said Katie Howe, parks and recreation administrative assistant.

“It’s helping to keep us aware of what’s going on in the preserve,” Howe said.

So far no calls have come in with conflicts regarding horses or mountain bikers, Howe said.

Gordon Leon, who formerly chaired the city’s equestrian committee, said the trails plan has worked pretty well.

“The trails are integral to the semi rural nature of Rancho Palos Verdes,” Leon said. “We have enviably one of the best trail networks certainly in the South Bay and to a greater extent Los Angeles. I think we’ve come to a reasonably amicable solution.” ER

Federal Trails Funding Secured for Two Years

Tuesday, September 4th, 2012

The Recreational Trails Program (RTP), the federal funding program that supports natural surface trails, has been reauthorized for two years in a bill that the U.S. Congress approved this July. An $85 million program, RTP strongly benefits mountain bikers and funds the development and maintenance of thousands of trail miles.

“We are very grateful to our grassroots advocates whose relentless calls and letters elevated the importance of RTP. This has been an extremely long reauthorization process — time and time again, mountain bikers rallied to save RTP,” says Jenn Dice, IMBA Government Affairs Director. “We also would like to thank U.S. Sen. Klobuchar and U.S. Rep. Petri for their commitment to the program and seeing it through this difficult process.”

RTP has funded iconic mountain bike trail projects across the country, including two IMBA Epics: FATS in North Carolina and Brown County State Park in Indiana. RTP funds were also used in the construction of the just-opened Rockburn Skills Park in Maryland and the Highbridge Bike Park in New York City. IMBA chapters and clubs have become experts in securing RTP grants for trail construction and maintenance.

In a new development, governors and state-level department of transportation offices have the opportunity to opt out of the entire program and return funds collected on behalf of RTP back to other uses (such as roads). For example, a state like Colorado could lose more than $2 million that would have otherwise gone to singletrack, trailheads and other expenditures that benefit mountain bikers. IMBA urges its members to contact their Governors about the importance of RTP funding for trails. Governors must decide by mid-September, so do not delay.

Groups interested in taking advantage of RTP funding to further trail projects should visit imba. com/resources to learn more.

Copied from IMBA Trail News, Summer 2012

It’s not Strava’s Fault Mountain Bikers are Ignorant

Monday, September 3rd, 2012

By Mark Langton

It has come to our attention that it is possible that small group of mountain bikers is using the web site Strava to have “competitions” in various locations around the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation area.

Strava allows you to track and upload your outings onto their web site via a GPS tracking device. The data ncludes the time it took you to traverse a particular route. It seems that some mountain bikers are using this feature to create a “time trail” competition and posting their times to see who is fastest. Obviously, trying to go as fast as possible on our shared use trails is not acceptable as it can endanger other users, including but not limited to mountain bikers. In response to this situation, we have learned that National Park Service rangers will be intensifying their presence at locations known to be experiencing this time trial scenario, Cheeseboro Canyon Park in Agoura Hills being one of them.

Currently it is the policy of the Santa Monica Mountains National Recreation Area’s managing agencies that events that displace or affect the safety of other trail users on public open space trails are prohibited. If you want to race, go to a sanctioned race (usacycling.org). If you want to go fast, go to a location that is set up for high speed mountain biking, such as Mammoth Mountain (mammothmountain.com).

County Seeks Public Input on Trails in NW San Fernando Valley

Friday, August 31st, 2012

Thursday evening, August 30, Los Angeles County held their first public input meeting for the Northwest San Fernando Trail Master Plan in Granada Hills. About 40 people were in attendance, including at least 7 from the mountain biking community. This was an information gathering session for the County, being conducted by Sapphos Environmental, the lead consultants for the project. Sapphos also helped develop the County’s Trail Manual and have collaborated with them on many other projects.

LA County NW San Fernando Trail Master Plan Study Area

LA County NW San Fernando Trail Master Plan Study Area

After a slate of introductions, Sapphos Environmental president Marie Campbell gave an overview of the process. From her outline and the numerous audience questions that ensued, it seemed like this meeting and call for public input might have been somewhat premature. Several members of the audience asked about specific subdivisions that have already been approved and which include trail easements, trail easements that are on record, newly approved equestrian parks and facilities, and other data, none of which were available.

Sapphos and the County have been in contact with State Parks, Mountains Recreation Conservation Authority, City of Los Angeles, Rim of the Valley Trail, and other adjacent public land agencies to coordinate with their trail plans. However, they could not supply data about existing or proposed trail alignments in those other jurisdictions to which many of the attendees would like to see trail connections. No trails in other jurisdictions appeared on the maps.

The room was set up with six easels with larger scale aerial photos of the study area, two each for hikers, cyclists and equestrians. We were asked to mark in one color trails that we are currently using, and in another color, trails and/or connections that we would like to see in the future. The aerial photos that were supplied, while larger scale than the study area map above, did not have any existing fire roads or trails, nor did they have any geographic markers or place names on them. This lack of background data made it extremely difficult to identify routes that we currently use, and more difficult to say where we’d like to see new connections and trails.

Marking a trail wishlist

Marking a trail wishlist

One issue that was raised is the fact that these trails will be multi-use trails including bicycles per County policy, wherever feasible. The southern boundary of the study area is all City of Los Angeles, where a blanket policy prohibits bikes on all trails unless specifically authorized. It was explained that in such cases, signage will be important to advise cyclists that a trail on which they are currently riding may pass into the jurisdiction of the City of Los Angeles, at which point the bicyclist would have to turn around and return. We feel it important that the County sticks to their multi-use policy, even when trails connect to City trails where bikes are not allowed.

This is a great opportunity to plan for some vital connections and help fulfill the unmet and growing demand for recreational trails around the San Fernando Valley. There is so much open space (8363 acres in the study area) but it is pockmarked with private properties, utility easements, gas lines and other infrastructure. This makes passage through the Santa Susanna Mountains by trail users very difficult. Many existing trails are old ranch roads and are unnamed and unmarked. Many unofficial trails have been created by the community and used for decades. In fact, the only official County trail in the study area is the Indian Springs/Indian falls trail, which lies partially within a subdivision, connecting to Johnson Motorway and Devil’s Canyon.

We’d of course like to see a way to ride from Mission Peak over to Weldon and Towsley, connections to the proposed Rim of the Valley trail, an east-west running trail from Mission Peak and O’Melveny park to Oat Mountain, Fossil Hill, Rocky Peak fire road and Las Llajas Canyon. These would lie partially outside the study area, and for that reason, we also suggested that the study area be expanded in its northwest section.

While the County does not have an easy way to submit data electronically, we encourage those familiar with the area to contact Steve Messer with GPS tracks of trails that are currently in common use, as well as trail connections that would be desired (GPS, Google Earth, hand-drawn, or however you can submit them). The County is accepting suggestions through Park Planner Lorrie Bradley (lbradley@parks.lacounty.gov). While no formal deadline for comments and suggestions was given, we were told they would accept comments by email for “the next few weeks.”

 

LA County Trail Plan Public Hearing for NW San Fernando Valley, Aug 30

Thursday, August 9th, 2012

Sapphos Environmental, Inc. is sending this e-mail on behalf of the County of Los Angeles (County) Department of Parks and Recreation to inform community members of the proposed Northwest San Fernando Valley Area Trail Plan including Rim of the Valley (proposed project). The intent of the County is to develop a trail plan for trails to guide future trail development to meet needs in the Northwest San Fernando Valley Area. Currently, the study area consists broadly of the unincorporated territory of the County bounded by the Ventura County line on the west, the Santa Susana Mountains (Johnson Motorway Trail, Rim of the Valley Trail, Oat Mountain Motorway Trail, and Weldon Canyon Trail) to the north, Interstate 5 to the east, and Roscoe Boulevard to the south, with provisions for connections to other nearby existing and planned recreational resources. The overall work effort would include a trail plan and associated California Environmental Quality Act documentation. The County is currently in the early development stages of the proposed project.

The County will hold a public outreach meeting to engage trail users and the surrounding communities and solicit ideas for the trail plan. The public outreach meeting is scheduled for:

Northwest San Fernando Valley Area Trail Plan including Rim of the Valley Public Outreach Meeting
Thursday, August 30, 2012
6:00 pm
Granada Room
Knollwood Country Club
12024 Balboa Blvd.
Granada Hills, CA 91344  
Please reply to this e-mail to indicate whether you are interested in receiving further updates on the proposed project and related meetings, or if you prefer to be removed from the contact list. If you are interested, please state in the e-mail whether you would be available for the scheduled public outreach meeting on Thursday August 30, 2012 at 6:00 p.m., and provide the following information:·        Name
·        Affiliation (trail group, etc.)
·        Area of interest (hiking, biking, equestrian, etc.)
·        Current e-mail address (if applicable)
·        E-mail addresses of other potentially interested parties you may know

Thank you for your time. Should you have any additional questions, please contact Ms. Lorrie Bradley at LBradley@parks.lacounty.gov or (213) 738-2812.

Sincerely,

SAPPHOS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.

Leanna Guillermo

www.sapphosenvironmental.com